Vote now for Best of Detroit 2021

Wednesday, March 31, 2010


Julianne Moore saves a limp sex thriller

Posted By on Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 12:00 AM

High-class trash dolled up as art, Chloe is the sort of a lowbrow-highbrow fusion that might happen if John Cheever wrote for Penthouse forum. It's a would-be thriller, mired in the upper-middle-class guilt of miserable people living fabulous lives but still unhappy enough to seek release through tawdry fantasies. 

These are the kind of folks who literally live in glass houses — in this case a modernist glass-walled yuppie cube in a fancy section of Toronto — where the wintry air mirrors the icy relationship status of David (Liam Neeson) and wife Catherine Stewart (Julianne Moore). She's a doctor, and he's some sort of academic rock star, jet-setting the continent, from campus to campus, as nubile coeds hang on his every word. 

Of course, all this gallivanting makes Stewart do the logical thing, and hire top-notch prostitute Chloe (Amanda Seyfried) to catch David in the act. In the Bad Idea Hall of Fame, this ranks with New Coke and the Ford Edsel. Soon the plot unravels, but not how you'd expect. The reserved doc becomes aroused by Chloe's erotically charged stories about her hired encounters, and the two women become fatally attracted.    

Before it devolves into a game of peek-a-boo shocks, Chloe is a fairly compelling drama, but as talented director Atom Egoyan cranks up the titillation he loses his touch with reality. 

Moore excels at playing brittle, wounded characters — she's predictably good here — but in comparison her co-stars are a letdown. Neeson's phoning it in, getting by on his residual charisma, which is substantial. Seyfried (the eldest daughter on Big Love), however, with her round, expressive eyes, does her best to make sense of her goofy character's confused motivations, but it's too tough a challenge; you can't add menace to a girl who's all about puppy-dog sadness.  This is bone-dry erotica that makes sex look simultaneously exciting and joyless, and it's also fairly weak in suspense, which is a downer from a director who knows his sex and danger.

Corey Hall writes about film for Metro Times. Send comments to


We welcome readers to submit letters regarding articles and content in Detroit Metro Times. Letters should be a minimum of 150 words, refer to content that has appeared on Detroit Metro Times, and must include the writer's full name, address, and phone number for verification purposes. No attachments will be considered. Writers of letters selected for publication will be notified via email. Letters may be edited and shortened for space.

Email us at

Support Local Journalism.
Join the Detroit Metro Times Press Club

Local journalism is information. Information is power. And we believe everyone deserves access to accurate independent coverage of their community and state. Our readers helped us continue this coverage in 2020, and we are so grateful for the support.

Help us keep this coverage going in 2021. Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing membership pledge, your support goes to local-based reporting from our small but mighty team.

Join the Metro Times Press Club for as little as $5 a month.

Read the Digital Print Issue

October 13, 2021

View more issues


Never miss a beat

Sign Up Now

Subscribe now to get the latest news delivered right to your inbox.

Best Things to Do In Detroit

© 2021 Detroit Metro Times - Contact Us

Website powered by Foundation