Wednesday, December 14, 2005

The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

Posted By on Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 12:00 AM

Once upon a time, before Harry Potter, there was another wildly popular series of children’s novels that captured the hearts and imaginations of several generations: C.S. Lewis’ The Chronicles of Narnia. In the much-anticipated first film adaptation of the series, the four Pevensie siblings, Peter (William Moseley), Susan (Anna Popplewell), Edmund (Skandar Keynes) and Lucy (Georgie Henley), travel through a magical wardrobe to the land of Narnia, where trees can talk and mythical creatures exist. But Narnia isn’t just holiday fantasy camp: The evil White Witch (Tilda Swinton) has held sway there for 100 years, brutalizing Narnia’s indigenous creatures and creating a perpetually snowy landscape where it’s always winter but never Christmas (and as anyone who’s lived in Michigan from January to March can attest, winter with no Christmas is a truly horrid prospect). The four Pevensie children, along with a host of talking animals and the great lion Aslan (voice by Liam Neeson), must defeat the Witch in accordance with an ancient prophecy and take their rightful places as the rulers of Narnia.

On the one hand, director Andrew Adamson’s cinematic adaptation is beautifully rendered. Aslan looks about as not goofy as a talking lion can aspire to look, and creatures like centaurs and hippogriffs leap to life on the screen. The human casting is spot-on: Swinton, always amazing, is terrifying as the dreadlocked, icicle-adorned White Witch. And for the most part, the child actors execute their parts competently, though Henley and Keynes are standouts.

But something is still missing.

It’s no small feat to make fantasy work. Magical happenings must develop organically, out of clearly understandable roots. The task is even harder for a fantasy that begins grounded in our reality.

In Lewis’ novels, even the mundane world is imbued with a sense of mystery, and Narnia isn’t so much a place where magic happens as it is a place that’s magical. It’s a droll, inviting place, where it seems likely that a faun might invite you into a cozy, overstuffed drawing room for tea and toast. It’s hard to see that in Adamson’s film. The opening scenes of the movie are set during the Luftwaffe’s bombing of London.

The book, in contrast, opens with the four Pevensie siblings in situ at the country home of an old professor. Lewis notes, almost parenthetically, that the story is about something that happened to the siblings “when they were sent away from London during the war because of the air-raids.” That’s the only mention the war gets. It takes a long time for the film to recover from a beginning that’s so solidly planted in reality. Even when 8-year-old Lucy enters Narnia, it just doesn’t feel magical.

Also confusing are some of the choices Adamson has made with the Pevensie clan. The kids aren’t very likable for at least the first half of the movie — they don’t even seem to like each other. The movie has clearly tried to make the story’s most difficult character, Edmund, more sympathetic. And thanks to Keynes’ fine acting job, Edmund is the most fully fleshed-out. But this comes at the expense of the others: Susan is a shrew, Peter a disciplinarian. It’s troubling that characters so rooted in bonhomie can be made so petulant.

About halfway through, the movie gains enough momentum to sweep up even a disenchanted viewer. The final battle between the forces of good and the White Witch’s army is everything fans of the series could have hoped for.

In the hype before the film’s release, much was made of the book’s function as a Christian allegory. Though the story contains obvious parallels to Christianity, the movie, like the book, works on two levels: if you want to see Christian symbolism, it’s there, but if you’re a happy heathen, you won’t get clobbered on the head with Jesus-y goodness.

Nancy Kaffer writes about film for Metro Times. Send comments to


We welcome readers to submit letters regarding articles and content in Detroit Metro Times. Letters should be a minimum of 150 words, refer to content that has appeared on Detroit Metro Times, and must include the writer's full name, address, and phone number for verification purposes. No attachments will be considered. Writers of letters selected for publication will be notified via email. Letters may be edited and shortened for space.

Email us at

Support Local Journalism.
Join the Detroit Metro Times Press Club

Local journalism is information. Information is power. And we believe everyone deserves access to accurate independent coverage of their community and state. Our readers helped us continue this coverage in 2020, and we are so grateful for the support.

Help us keep this coverage going in 2021. Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing membership pledge, your support goes to local-based reporting from our small but mighty team.

Join the Metro Times Press Club for as little as $5 a month.

More by Nancy Kaffer

Read the Digital Print Issue

November 24, 2021

View more issues


Never miss a beat

Sign Up Now

Subscribe now to get the latest news delivered right to your inbox.

Best Things to Do In Detroit

© 2021 Detroit Metro Times - Contact Us

Website powered by Foundation