See our Best of Detroit 2020 winners.

Wednesday, August 31, 2005

Brothers Grimm

Posted By on Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 12:00 AM

Since 1981’s Time Bandits, Terry Gilliam has established himself as one of the most iconoclastic and visually inventive directors in or out of Hollywood. From Brazil to 12 Monkeys to Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, his films explode with intelligence and a giddy sense of artistic mayhem. Even such cinematic misfires as The Adventures of Baron Munchausen boast moments of undeniable grace and wit. Gilliam often aims for targets no other filmmaker would even attempt.

Unfortunately, he’s also a filmmaker of uncommonly bad luck. His productions are notorious for budget-breaking catastrophes and pie-in-the-sky ambitions, as captured in the 2002 documentary Lost in La Mancha. It’s no surprise that his relationship with the studios is less than cozy.

In what must be an offering of the olive branch to Hollywood, the former Monty Python animator’s first film in seven years is the most obviously commercial work of his career. Influenced more by Scooby Doo than the traditional Brothers Grimm stories, the frantic, overly schematic script from Ehren Kruger (The Ring, Scream 3) misses many opportunities for greatness. The film reimagines the 18th century storytelling scholars as con men who travel around the countryside posing as supernatural exterminators. Jake (Heath Ledger) and Will (Matt Damon) Grimm bilk superstitious townsfolk by “vanquishing” marauding trolls and witches. Jake is the nebbish dreamer who believes in fantastic folktales while Will is a dogged pragmatist and flamboyant ham. With their divergent beliefs, the brothers bicker and feud in a classic display of sibling love and hate.

When a Napoleonic general (Gilliam stalwart Jonathan Pryce) captures the hucksters, he forces them to investigate strange reports from a remote village — young maidens have gone missing in the nearby woods. Convinced they’re up against rival scam artists, the brothers recruit a local huntress (Lena Headey) and search for the missing girls inside a menacing forest, where they encounter an evil sorceress locked in an immense tower and mystical foes from their darkest imagination.

Alternately bombastic and whimsical, the film doesn’t offer much in the way of subtlety. Even more frustrating is the narrative’s complete lack of subtext. Shockingly, Kruger has nothing to say about fairy tales, true love or even the brothers’ relationship. He doesn’t so much explore the Grimm fairy tales as name-drop them.

Luckily, Gilliam recognizes these shortcomings and uses the film as a canvas for his unbridled aesthetics. With flourishes inspired by the lavish black-and-white illustrations of fairy tale books, he fills the ham-fisted story with breathtaking imagery. The sets and cinematography are layered with texture and atmosphere, and the costumes and props dazzle with otherworldly deformity. The film has a dark and surreal energy that evokes the nightmares of childhood.

Brothers Grimm is also Gilliam’s first foray into computer-generated effects that, while occasionally shoddy, still bear his strikingly original influence. Walking trees, an evil mud man, a sorceress (Monica Bellucci) who reverses age from 500 to 30, and a possessed horse that swallows children whole are all rendered with memorable panache.

The cast, for the most part, does an admirable job. Damon wrestles with his underdeveloped character (and his accent) but eventually finds the right comic tone for Will’s hammy bravado. Ledger’s amiably bookish portrayal of Jacob is both charming and heroic. Headey, playing the romantic lead, unfortunately is a beautiful bore, generating few sparks with her male co-stars.

With grotesque caricatures, sumptuous visuals and unrepentantly lowbrow gags, the film often threatens to careen into utter cartoonishness. Still, Gilliam’s enormous talents are on full display, proving once again that he’s one of the most interesting and underrated filmmakers working today.

Jeff Meyers writes about film for MetroTimes. Send comments to letters@metrotimes.com.

Tags:

We welcome readers to submit letters regarding articles and content in Detroit Metro Times. Letters should be a minimum of 150 words, refer to content that has appeared on Detroit Metro Times, and must include the writer's full name, address, and phone number for verification purposes. No attachments will be considered. Writers of letters selected for publication will be notified via email. Letters may be edited and shortened for space.

Email us at letters@metrotimes.com.

Detroit Metro Times works for you, and your support is essential.

Our small but mighty local team works tirelessly to bring you high-quality, uncensored news and cultural coverage of Detroit and beyond.

Unlike many newspapers, ours is free – and we'd like to keep it that way, because we believe, now more than ever, everyone deserves access to accurate, independent coverage of their community.

Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing pledge, your support helps keep Detroit's true free press free.

Read the Digital Print Issue

October 14, 2020

View more issues

Newsletters

Never miss a beat

Sign Up Now

Subscribe now to get the latest news delivered right to your inbox.

Best Things to Do In Detroit