Wednesday, July 17, 2002

Halloween: Resurrection

Posted By on Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 12:00 AM

Does a live Webcast of several college kids locked in a haunted house sound especially scary or clever to you? Not in this seventh sequel to director John Carpenter’s seminal slasher flick, Halloween (1978).

Don’t let the trailer or billing fool you: Jamie Lee Curtis’ Laurie Strode, the heroine of both the original movie and Halloween H20: Twenty Years Later (1998), becomes just a loose end to be tied up from H20. She cagily sits in her insane asylum cell prepared and waiting for the return of psycho-killer-bogeyman Michael Myers. It’s not a long wait and the part ends up a cameo, so don’t expect the depth Curtis brought to her last outings with Myers.

Depth of any kind is the last thing you should expect from this glorified B-movie. Characters can often be summed up in a few words. Jenna wants to be a star, so she signs herself up with her pals: Rudy, a cook (Sean Patrick Thomas), and Sara (Bianca Kajlich), the new heroine for impresario Freddie Harris’ (Busta Rhymes) Dangertainment productions Webcast promotion. The three buds (and some more college-age slasher fodder) enter Myers’ childhood home, the site of his first murder, strap on Webcams and make like the haunted-house edition of “The Real World” meets “Survivor.” Then Myers comes home.

The original Halloween was a cautionary tale. Carpenter called the bogeyman out from our closets and beneath our beds and trapped him on film. Myers was a new breed — Psycho’s Norman Bates meets indestructible, masked supervillain — but he played the same old role: parental enforcer. The subliminal message of Halloween became the subliminal message of a genre of knockoffs such as Friday the 13th, Nightmare on Elm Street and a score of others: Lose your virginity and you’ll lose your life, kids. The Scream series parodied it, making it explicit.

Halloween: Resurrection continues in the same hackneyed vein. The retreaded scares still work, though there’s nothing spectacular about them. But this film is also a new cautionary tale — for Hollywood if no one else: If you give Busta Rhymes anything larger than a supporting role, he’ll glaringly prove that he can’t act; and if you don’t truly revive a sequel, it’ll die on the screen.

James Keith La Croix writes about film for Metro Times. Send comments to


We welcome readers to submit letters regarding articles and content in Detroit Metro Times. Letters should be a minimum of 150 words, refer to content that has appeared on Detroit Metro Times, and must include the writer's full name, address, and phone number for verification purposes. No attachments will be considered. Writers of letters selected for publication will be notified via email. Letters may be edited and shortened for space.

Email us at

Support Local Journalism.
Join the Detroit Metro Times Press Club

Local journalism is information. Information is power. And we believe everyone deserves access to accurate independent coverage of their community and state. Our readers helped us continue this coverage in 2020, and we are so grateful for the support.

Help us keep this coverage going in 2021. Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing membership pledge, your support goes to local-based reporting from our small but mighty team.

Join the Metro Times Press Club for as little as $5 a month.

More by James Keith La Croix

Read the Digital Print Issue

December 1, 2021

View more issues


Never miss a beat

Sign Up Now

Subscribe now to get the latest news delivered right to your inbox.

Best Things to Do In Detroit

© 2021 Detroit Metro Times - Contact Us

Website powered by Foundation