Trump, Brexit, and the dumbing down of democracy

click to enlarge Trump, Brexit, and the dumbing down of democracy
John Gomez /

At a campaign rally last week in Grand Rapids, the president of the United States and keeper of the world's largest nuclear arsenal — after asserting that he's smarter than all the elites and lying that the Mueller probe had been a "total exoneration, complete vindication" — told a sea of white people that, had Hillary Clinton been elected, America wouldn't be producing as much oil and gas. "You'd be doing wind. Windmills. Wheeee. And if it doesn't blow, you can forget about television for that night. 'Darling, I want to watch television.' 'I'm sorry! The wind isn't blowing.' I know a lot about wind." (Fact check: He doesn't.)

A few days later, the "very stable genius" announced that, to stem the surge of migrants fleeing poverty in El Salvador, Honduras, and Guatemala, he would cut off aid to those countries, because nothing makes poor people want to flee poverty more than making them poorer. Donald Trump also threatened to shut down the Mexico-U.S. border, which would disrupt $300 billion in trade and wreak economic havoc.

Border Patrol officials reported more than 100,000 apprehensions in March, the highest in a decade. Nearly all are seeking asylum — a right guaranteed under U.S. and international law — and nine in 10 did not enter at legal ports of entry. The wall won't stop them, and cutting off aid will only make things worse. Cutting off aid while shutting down the border would be both self-defeating and cruel.

Which is to say: Of course that's what Trump's going to do.

Which is also to say: American politics is so incredibly dumb right now. The only consolation, if you can call it that, is that British politics is somehow even dumber.

Caveat emptor: I claim no expertise on British politics, nor the intricacies of Brexit. But the UK's looming maybe-divorce from the European Union — a tangled knot of economic and cultural connections that proved easier to talk about undoing than to actually undo — shares a lot of DNA with the menace of the Trump administration. In fact, these events share a common foundation in a moment of populist insanity.

The 52–48 Brexit referendum, passed five months before Trump's election, was a populist revolt against the urban, multicultural elite, couched in the rhetoric of economic anxiety, not-so-thinly masking resentment of immigrants and refugees. It was propped up by sweeping promises — untethered to reality — of better health care and trade deals. It also passed because few thought the country would be insane enough to pass it. The polls showed Remain in the lead, so Remainers were complacent.

Sound familiar?

The biggest outstanding issue is the Irish border. Since the 1998 Good Friday agreement, the border between the independent Republic of Ireland and the UK's Northern Ireland has been completely open for trade and movement. Post-Brexit, that could no longer be the case; there would be checkpoints, inspections and customs. And nobody wanted that. But years of negotiation failed to produce a viable workaround. The last-ditch effort was the so-called Irish backstop, which would keep Northern Ireland in the EU's single market until at least December 2020 and effectively commit the UK to the EU's customs union until both entities agree it's no longer necessary.

But that's proven too soft a Brexit for the hardliners in Prime Minister Theresa May's party, and not soft enough for the members of Parliament who think Brexit was idiotic to begin with. As a result, no position — a hard Brexit, May's deal, a softer Brexit, or abandoning Brexit altogether — could achieve a majority.

It was, as the Brits say, a shambles.

Friday was supposed to be Brexit Day. May, however, got a reprieve from the EU to give her one last chance to sell her agreement. But Parliament rejected it for the third time.

On Monday — after I file this column — Parliament was set to consider six alternatives, none of which have passed before: May's deal, but giving the UK the unilateral right to exit the backstop (assuming the EU agrees); a no-deal, hard Brexit (which experts believe would be catastrophic); two proposals to keep the UK in an EU customs union (one of which nearly passed last week); and two motions to call a second, "are you sure about this?" referendum (as in 2016, polls show a slim lead for Remain).

The Brits could get a do-over pretty soon, with a better understanding of the consequences that furtive spurt of right-wing populism actually entailed. Americans will have to wait until November 2020 to decide whether this is the kind of country we want to be.

Stay on top of Detroit news and views. Sign up for our weekly issue newsletter delivered each Wednesday.

About The Author

Jeffrey C. Billman

North Carolina-based journalist, focusing on politics and policy analysis.
Scroll to read more Informed Dissent articles
Join the Metro Times Press Club

Local journalism is information. Information is power. And we believe everyone deserves access to accurate independent coverage of their community and state.
Help us keep this coverage going with a one-time donation or an ongoing membership pledge.


Join Detroit Metro Times Newsletters

Subscribe now to get the latest news delivered right to your inbox.