See our Best of Detroit 2020 winners.

Suspicious minds 

Call ’em paranoid kooks. But when it comes to the Michigan Department of Transportation — and its plans to “improve” I-94 — they say something stinks. And it’s not merely the $1.3 billion MDOT wants to spend on the seven-mile strip between Conner and I-96 that has critics’ eyebrows raised. They suspect — and for good reason — that MDOT has more in store for the old freeway than it is letting on. According to MDOT’s “Five Year Road and Bridge Program,” a 104-page booklet released last week, I-94 improvements could span from southwest Detroit to Macomb County.

“That could be as much as $3.3 billion,” says Karen Kendrick-Hands, president of Transportation Riders United, a grassroots organization that supports mass transit and opposes the I-94 project.

According to the MDOT document, the seven-mile strip between Conner and I-96 is “the first phase of a larger project” to refurbish I-94 between Wyoming and I-696 — about 20 miles.

If this is MDOT’s plan, says Kendrick-Hands, its current study of the seven-mile strip along I-94 is not only a waste of the public’s time and money, but is illegal. MDOT has been working on an environmental impact study of the seven-mile strip to determine how the expanded highway — and the noise and pollution it will create — will affect the area. But Kendrick-Hands says that if MDOT plans to expand the highway beyond the seven-mile stretch, it is legally required to study the impact the entire project may have on the area, not just a portion of it.

“They have to address the impact all at once and they are not doing that and that’s illegal,” she says.

Kelly Thayer, Land Use Institute transportation project coordinator and critic of MDOT’s I-94 plan, agrees. He also says that if MDOT expands I-94 beyond the seven-mile stretch, the agency is also required to look at alternatives like mass transit to solve congestion problems.

But MDOT spokesperson Brenda Peek says that the state agency does not intend to expand I-94 beyond the seven-mile strip. She says that the MDOT booklet was referring to plans to refurbish the 33 bridges between Wyoming and I-696 and patch up the road, work that is currently under way.

But Kendrick-Hands is not so sure.

“They know if they told the public about all the project at once, you could not get the public’s approval,” she says.

Time will tell. Let’s just hope by then it’s not too late.

Meanwhile, MDOT has granted a 45-day extension for public comment on the I-94 plan for the seven-mile strip. Send all comments to Jose A. Lopez, Public Hearings Officer, at PO Box 30050, Lansing, MI 48909 or call 517-373-9534.

Ann Mullen contributed to News Hits, which is edited by Curt Guyette. He can be reached at 313-202-8004 or cguyette@metrotimes.com

We welcome readers to submit letters regarding articles and content in Detroit Metro Times. Letters should be a minimum of 150 words, refer to content that has appeared on Detroit Metro Times, and must include the writer's full name, address, and phone number for verification purposes. No attachments will be considered. Writers of letters selected for publication will be notified via email. Letters may be edited and shortened for space.

Email us at letters@metrotimes.com.

Detroit Metro Times works for you, and your support is essential.

Our small but mighty local team works tirelessly to bring you high-quality, uncensored news and cultural coverage of Detroit and beyond.

Unlike many newspapers, ours is free – and we'd like to keep it that way, because we believe, now more than ever, everyone deserves access to accurate, independent coverage of their community.

Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing pledge, your support helps keep Detroit's true free press free.

Read the Digital Print Issue

October 21, 2020

View more issues

Newsletters

Never miss a beat

Sign Up Now

Subscribe now to get the latest news delivered right to your inbox.

Best Things to Do In Detroit