See our Best of Detroit 2020 winners.

Friday, August 3, 2012

State Supreme Court orders EM question on ballot

Posted By on Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 3:22 PM

In a ruling that is admittedly complicated, the bottom line is clear: The Michigan Supreme Court has decided that a proposed referendum on the state’s controversial emergency manager law should be placed before voters on the November ballot.

It is a ruling filled with split decisions on various aspects of the case involving the size of  letters on petitions backing the referendum. In the end, though, four of the seven justices —Mary Beth Kelly, Michael F. Cavanagh, Marilyn Kelly and Diane M. Hathaway — issued an order directing the state Board of Canvassers to place the controversial measure on the ballot.

The decision effectively opens up a couple of new cans of legal worms.

The union-backed Stand Up for Democracy coalition, which collected the signatures necessary to get the referendum before voters, has contended that once it did qualify for the ballot, what’s officially known as Public Act 4 would be put on hold at least until Election Day.

What does that mean for cities such as Flint, Benton Harbor and Pontiac, where emergency managers are in place? The same question applies to Detroit Public Schools, where emergency manager Roy Roberts is currently calling all the shots.

Even more complicated, says Detroit City Councilman Kenneth V. Cockrel Jr., is the question of how the court’s decision affects the status of the fiscal stability agreement with the state that the city is currently operating under.

One view, says Cockrel, is that what is essentially a consent agreement entered into by the mayor and approved by a majority of the City Council, will remain in effect. But it also could be argued that the agreement is actually the result of PA 4, and would not have been signed if the threat of having an emergency manager installed hadn’t been hanging over them.

So, does the consent agreement remain in effect?

Cockrel says he doesn’t have an answer to that question.

In all likelihood, the court fights surrounding these issues are far from over.

Tags:

We welcome readers to submit letters regarding articles and content in Detroit Metro Times. Letters should be a minimum of 150 words, refer to content that has appeared on Detroit Metro Times, and must include the writer's full name, address, and phone number for verification purposes. No attachments will be considered. Writers of letters selected for publication will be notified via email. Letters may be edited and shortened for space.

Email us at letters@metrotimes.com.

Detroit Metro Times works for you, and your support is essential.

Our small but mighty local team works tirelessly to bring you high-quality, uncensored news and cultural coverage of Detroit and beyond.

Unlike many newspapers, ours is free – and we'd like to keep it that way, because we believe, now more than ever, everyone deserves access to accurate, independent coverage of their community.

Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing pledge, your support helps keep Detroit's true free press free.

Read the Digital Print Issue

October 28, 2020

View more issues

Newsletters

Never miss a beat

Sign Up Now

Subscribe now to get the latest news delivered right to your inbox.

Best Things to Do In Detroit